Data Pipeline Visualization

The reality of 1,000 "Active" Vacancies

Your team burns 15+ hours a week on sourcing. We analyzed the dataset of 1,000 typical LinkedIn job postings.

This isn't sourcing; it is manual filtering.

External Agencies

(Competitors)
300

Corporate Recruiters

(Gatekeepers)
250

Noise

(Internships, duplicates, no acquisition)
410

Real Opportunities

(Verified hiring signals)
40

Want to see what the 4% looks like? Request a free sample

The Prospecting Tax

Manual lead generation doesn't just waste time. It drains confidence, focus, and consistency before the first dial.

Stale Data

30% of CRM data expires yearly

Your "leads" are often wrong numbers and bounced emails. Every outdated contact wastes time and kills momentum.

Cognitive Overload

66% of reps feel overwhelmed by tools

Juggling 5+ systems kills focus and consistency. Context switching between CRM, LinkedIn, email, and spreadsheets drains mental energy.

Call Reluctance

80% of new salespeople fail from call reluctance

Low quality leads make picking up the phone harder. When you doubt the lead, your tone shows it.

Wasted Hours

Manual data validation can consume hundreds of hours per year in larger teams

That's working days lost to cleaning lists. Time that should be spent building relationships.

Signal-Based vs. Traditional Outbound

Intent-based leads convert better than cold lists. We don't give you more contacts. We give you better timing.

Reply Rate

Traditional ~5%
5% reply rate
Leads for Recruiters ~16.8%
3.4x higher ↗ 16.8% reply rate - 3.4 times higher

Meeting Conversion

Traditional 1-2%
1-2% meeting conversion
Leads for Recruiters 5.6%
Proven by our clients ↗ 5.6% meeting conversion - proven by our clients

Time on Research

Traditional 15+ hours/week
15+ hours per week
Leads for Recruiters < 1 hour/week
15x faster Less than 1 hour per week - 15 times faster

Data Decay

Traditional 30%/year
30% data decay per year
Leads for Recruiters Fresh within 24h
Always fresh Fresh within 24 hours - always current data

See the difference for yourself.

Try it free

Cost comparison model: manual vs signal-based prospecting

Calculate the true cost per meeting with traditional vs. signal-based leads

New client meetings you want to book
Internal cost per recruiter hour

Traditional Approach

Manual prospecting
Cost per meeting
€750
What's included:
  • 15 hours per meeting
  • 40% research & list building
  • 50% outreach (wrong numbers, gatekeepers)
  • 10% nurturing cold leads
Monthly cost
€7,500

Leads for Recruiters

Signal-based leads
Cost per meeting
€138
What's included:
  • 1.5 hours calling only
  • 18 verified leads* (€3.50 each)
  • 0h research - we handle this
  • Direct to decision makers
Monthly cost
€1,380
Note: LFR cost includes both lead cost AND your calling time
You save per month:
€6,120
(5.4x cheaper)
Annual savings:
€73,440

*Conversion rate: 5.6% commercial outcome rate in the Netherlands pilot.

Traditional time estimates: Based on industry benchmarks showing 10-20 hours per meeting (research, outreach, nurturing). We use 15 hours as conservative average.

Sources: Recruiter.com, HootRecruit.com, HubSpot industry benchmarks (2024-2025). Actual results depend on sales team quality, industry, and market conditions.

Stop overpaying for meetings.

Get your first dataset free and see the results within a week.

Request sample data

Structured for your CRM

Every lead comes enriched with verified contact data, intent signals, and context. Ready to import.

lead_export.csv
COMPANY
SIGNAL
DECISION MAKER
ENRICHMENT
SCORE
Logistics North
Rotterdam • logistics-north.nl
URGENT_HIRE
Posted: Today
Warehouse Manager
K. Jansen
Operations Director
Decision maker for logistics hires
Mobile:+31 6 55 ••• ••• Email:k.jansen@•••••• LinkedIn:LinkedIn
✓ Mobile verified
✓ Email validated
✓ Direct decision maker
94
High intent
TechFlow B.V.
Amsterdam • techflow.io
TEAM_GROWTH
Posted: Yesterday
Lead Engineer
M. de Vries
CTO
Manages engineering team growth
Mobile:+31 6 21 ••• ••• Email:m.devries@•••••• LinkedIn:LinkedIn
✓ Mobile verified
✓ Email validated
✓ Direct decision maker
89
High intent
BuildGroup
Utrecht • buildgroup.nl
NEW_PROJECT
Posted: Yesterday
Project Lead
P. Bakker
Owner
Final hiring authority
Mobile:+31 6 44 ••• ••• Email:p.bakker@•••••• LinkedIn:LinkedIn
✓ Mobile verified
✓ Email validated
✓ Direct decision maker
87
Medium intent

Data is verified and enriched before delivery. Includes job posting link, vacancy details, and match reasoning.

This is real data. Request a sample and see for yourself.

Download sample dataset

Frequently Asked Questions

Everything you need to know before getting started.